Parallel Verses

Holman Bible

So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

New American Standard Bible

For, on the one hand, there is a setting aside of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

King James Version

For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

International Standard Version

Indeed, because it was weak and ineffective, the former commandment has been annulled,

A Conservative Version

For indeed there becomes an annulment of a preceding commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

American Standard Version

For there is a disannulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness

Amplified

For, on the one hand, a former commandment is cancelled because of its weakness and uselessness [because of its inability to justify the sinner before God]

An Understandable Version

For on one hand, the previous command [i.e., the law of Moses] was set aside because it was weak and useless,

Anderson New Testament

For, indeed, there is a setting aside of the preceding commandment, because it was weak and unprofitable,

Bible in Basic English

So the law which went before is put on one side, because it was feeble and without profit.

Common New Testament

On the one hand, a former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness

Daniel Mace New Testament

wherefore the preceeding law is abolished for its being weak and useless.

Darby Translation

For there is a setting aside of the commandment going before for its weakness and unprofitableness,

Godbey New Testament

For there is a disannulling of the preceding commandment, on account of its weakness and inadequacy

Goodspeed New Testament

So an earlier regulation is abrogated because it was poor and ineffective

John Wesley New Testament

For verily there is a disannulling of the preceding commandment, for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

Julia Smith Translation

For there is truly an annulling of the command going before by its weakness and unprofitableness.

King James 2000

For there is verily an annulment of the previous commandment because of the weakness and uselessness thereof.

Lexham Expanded Bible

For on the one hand a preceding commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness

Modern King James verseion

For truly there is a putting away of the commandment which went before, because of the weakness and unprofitableness of it.

Modern Spelling Tyndale-Coverdale

Then the commandment that went afore, is disannulled, because of her weakness and unprofitableness.

Moffatt New Testament

A previous command is set aside on account of its weakness and uselessness

Montgomery New Testament

For there is a setting aside of a foregoing commandment, because of its weakness and unprofitableness

NET Bible

On the one hand a former command is set aside because it is weak and useless,

New Heart English Bible

For there is an annulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

Noyes New Testament

For on the one hand there takes place an annulling of the commandment which went before, on account of its weakness and unprofitableness,

Sawyer New Testament

For there is an abrogation of the commandment which goes before, on account of its weakness and unprofitableness;

The Emphasized Bible

For, a setting aside, doth, indeed, take place, of a foregoing commandment, by reason of its own weakness and unprofitableness, -

Thomas Haweis New Testament

For there is indeed an abrogation of the preceding command, because of its weakness and inutility.

Twentieth Century New Testament

On the one hand, we have the abolition of a previous regulation as being both inefficient and useless

Webster

For there is verily a disannulling of the preceding commandment on account of its weakness and unprofitableness.

Weymouth New Testament

On the one hand we have here the abrogation of an earlier code because it was weak and ineffective--

Williams New Testament

Indeed, the rescinding of a previous regulation takes place, because it was weak and ineffective --

World English Bible

For there is an annulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

Worrell New Testament

For there is verily an annulling of a previous commandment, on account of its weakness and unprofitableness

Worsley New Testament

For there is indeed a disannulling of the preceding command, on account of it's weakness and unprofitableness;

Youngs Literal Translation

for a disannulling indeed doth come of the command going before because of its weakness, and unprofitableness,

Interlinear

English(KJV)
Strong's
Root Form
Definition
Usage
For
γάρ 
Gar 
for, , not tr
Usage: 825

there is
γίνομαι 
Ginomai 
be, come to pass, be made, be done, come, become, God forbid , arise, have, be fulfilled, be married to, be preferred, not tr, , vr done
Usage: 531

μέν 
men 
indeed, verily, truly, not tr,
Usage: 63

ἀθέτησις 
Athetesis 
Usage: 2

of the commandment
ἐντολή 
Entole 
Usage: 47

προάγω 
Proago 
Usage: 15

for
διά 
Dia 
by, through, with, for, for ... sake, therefore , for this cause , because,
Usage: 527

the weakness
ἀσθενής 
Asthenes 
Usage: 19

and

and, also, even, both, then, so, likewise, not tr., , vr and
Usage: 0

ἀνωφέλες 
Anopheles 
Usage: 2

References

Images Hebrews 7:18

Prayers for Hebrews 7:18

Context Readings

Another Priest, Like Melchizedek

17 For it has been testified:

You are a priest forever
in the order of Melchizedek.
18 So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable 19 (for the law perfected nothing), but a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God.



Cross References

Romans 8:3

What the law could not do since it was limited by the flesh, God did. He condemned sin in the flesh by sending His own Son in flesh like ours under sin’s domain, and as a sin offering,

Galatians 4:9

But now, since you know God, or rather have become known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and bankrupt elemental forces? Do you want to be enslaved to them all over again?

Acts 13:39

and everyone who believes in Him is justified from everything that you could not be justified from through the law of Moses.

Romans 3:31

Do we then cancel the law through faith? Absolutely not! On the contrary, we uphold the law.

Galatians 3:15

Brothers, I’m using a human illustration. No one sets aside or makes additions to even a human covenant that has been ratified.

Galatians 3:17

And I say this: The law, which came 430 years later, does not revoke a covenant that was previously ratified by God and cancel the promise.

Galatians 4:21

Tell me, those of you who want to be under the law, don’t you hear the law?

1 Timothy 4:8

for

the training of the body has a limited benefit,
but godliness is beneficial in every way,
since it holds promise for the present life
and also for the life to come.

Hebrews 7:11-12

If then, perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?

Hebrews 7:19

(for the law perfected nothing), but a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God.

Hebrews 8:7-13

For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion for a second one.

Hebrews 9:9-10

This is a symbol for the present time, during which gifts and sacrifices are offered that cannot perfect the worshiper’s conscience.

Hebrews 10:1-9

Since the law has only a shadow of the good things to come, and not the actual form of those realities, it can never perfect the worshipers by the same sacrifices they continually offer year after year.

Hebrews 13:9

Don’t be led astray by various kinds of strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be established by grace and not by foods, since those involved in them have not benefited.

King James Version Public Domain

Holman Christian Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2009 by Holman Bible Publishers.

International Standard Version Copyright © 1996-2008 by the ISV Foundation.

New American Standard Bible Copyright ©1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation, La Habra, Calif. All rights reserved. For Permission to Quote Information visit http://www.lockman.org

American Standard Version Public Domain

NET Bible copyright © 1996-2006 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. NetBible

Basic English, produced by Mr C. K. Ogden of the Orthological Institute - public domain